8154578: Drop residual use of addReads from javadoc

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

8154578: Drop residual use of addReads from javadoc

Kumar Srinivasan
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 8154578: Drop residual use of addReads from javadoc

Alan Bateman


On 30/04/2016 15:50, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please review this easy fix.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8154578
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154578
This looks fine.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 8154578: Drop residual use of addReads from javadoc

Jonathan Gibbons

OK, but webrevs are not hard to generate and upload, and would have been
preferable.

-- Jon

On 04/30/2016 08:32 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:

>
>
> On 30/04/2016 15:50, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please review this easy fix.
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8154578
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154578
> This looks fine.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 8154578: Drop residual use of addReads from javadoc

Jonathan Gibbons
Doh!  I missed the webrev.  Mea-culpa.

-- Jon

On 05/02/2016 11:01 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:

>
> OK, but webrevs are not hard to generate and upload, and would have
> been preferable.
>
> -- Jon
>
> On 04/30/2016 08:32 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30/04/2016 15:50, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Please review this easy fix.
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8154578
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154578
>> This looks fine.
>