AW: AW: How to pin/avoid gc for an oop?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

AW: AW: How to pin/avoid gc for an oop?

Christian Hagedorn
Thanks for the clarifications. I have ensured to delete them properly afterwards.

 

Christian

 

Von: Jon V. [mailto:[hidden email]]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. März 2017 00:11
An: Christian Hagedorn
Cc: hotspot-dev
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: How to pin/avoid gc for an oop?

 

Just a quick note:

 

JNI is always a safe-point for GC.

 

JNI Critical Access prevents the GC from running.

 

JNI API calls always have to acquire and release the GC lock for every method.

 

NewGlobalRef must be explicitly deleted otherwise they will exist forever.

 

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Christian Hagedorn <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thank you all for your help and your suggestions! :)

That is right I only need a way to still reach it but not actually pin it. It seems to be working by creating a global ref with
JNIHandles::make_global(handle), which is exactly what the jni_NewGlobalRef function does pointed out by Ioi.
The GC did not remove the oops.

Christian

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: hotspot-dev [mailto:[hidden email]] Im Auftrag von Ioi Lam
Gesendet: Montag, 13. März 2017 13:43
An: Aleksey Shipilev; [hidden email]
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: How to pin/avoid gc for an oop?


I don't think Christian actually needs object pinning (as in avoiding relocation of an object due to GC).

- Ioi

On 3/13/17 8:36 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:

> Handle-izing / JNIRef-ing the oop != pinning.
>
> a) If you want pinning, you have to cooperate with GC somehow. JNI has
> "critical" operations for this, so it would be instructive to see
> jni_GetPrimitiveArrayCritical does this with GCLocker.
>
> b) If you just want the reachability, and are in native code, then JNI
> GlobalRef would probably be the cleanest choice.
>
> c) If you just want the reachability, and are in Java code, then
> calling java.lang.ref.Reference.reachabilityFence would retain the
> local var in the thread roots.
>
> -Aleksey
>
> On 03/13/2017 01:23 PM, Ioi Lam wrote:
>> How about using JNI NewGlobalRef/DeleteGlobalRef? Unlike the C++
>> "Handle" class (which is scoped and automatically reclaimed), a
>> reference created by NewGlobalRef remains valid until it's explicitly deleted using DeleteGlobalRef.
>>
>> - Ioi
>>
>> On 3/13/17 8:59 AM, Christian Hagedorn wrote:
>>> So handles are not really an option. What else could I do to make my
>>> undo log a GC root to ensure reachability of the oops in it?
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: David Holmes [mailto:[hidden email]]
>>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. März 2017 06:05
>>> An: Jon V.; Christian Hagedorn; [hidden email]
>>> Betreff: Re: AW: How to pin/avoid gc for an oop?
>>>
>>> On 12/03/2017 10:59 AM, Jon V. wrote:
>>>> I don't believe that handles will keep the objects from being
>>>> garbage collected.
>>> Handles are GC roots. Or rather the per-thread handle area is a GC root.
>>>
>>>> Hotspot does not support object pinning.
>>> This isn't pinning - the object can still be moved. But the Handle
>>> ensures it remains reachable.
>>>
>>>> Need input from a GC dev
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 7:53 PM Christian Hagedorn
>>>> <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The undo log would be stored as an array of handles inside a
>>>>> thread and does not refer to other threads. Would that work then?
>>> Handles are intended to be scoped and reclaimed using HandleMarks.
>>> This seem to require a different kind of usage.
>>>
>>> David
>>> -----
>>>
>>>>> Christian
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>> Von: David Holmes [mailto:[hidden email]]
>>>>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. März 2017 00:39
>>>>> An: Christian Hagedorn; [hidden email]
>>>>> Betreff: Re: AW: How to pin/avoid gc for an oop?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/03/2017 9:08 PM, Christian Hagedorn wrote:
>>>>>> Thank you for your answers. If it is possible to do it in the JVM
>>>>>> I
>>>>> would prefer to do that.
>>>>>> I have tried to maintain an array of handles. However I think I
>>>>>> have not
>>>>> understood its usage correctly. I only saw examples by allocating
>>>>> it on the stack with Handle h1(thread, oop). But how can I create
>>>>> a handle on the heap such that it is kept alive for an access
>>>>> later? It asserts not to call the global operator "new" such that "new Handle(..)"
>>>>> does not work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry that was incorrect advice. Handles are per-thread so you
>>>>> can't have a data structure storing them across threads.
>>>>>
>>>>>> How could  I make the log  a GC root?
>>>>> GC folk should chime in on the details of that - I don't want to
>>>>> give more bad advice.
>>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>>> Von: David Holmes [mailto:[hidden email]]
>>>>>> Gesendet: Samstag, 11. März 2017 04:58
>>>>>> An: Christian; Jon V.
>>>>>> Cc: [hidden email]
>>>>>> Betreff: Re: How to pin/avoid gc for an oop?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/03/2017 6:56 PM, Christian wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The STM is to be integrated into the JVM, but the transactional
>>>>>>> execution only affects modifications to the managed memory done
>>>>>>> by bytecode instructions. JVM internal structures are unaffected.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here an example:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> class X {
>>>>>>>      int f;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      public static update(X x, int _new) {
>>>>>>>         atomic { // tx start
>>>>>>>            // (1) update field f of x:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>            // undo log maintains a reference to x and old value of f
>>>>>>>            // note: x contains a direct reference to the lock
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>            x.f = _new;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>            // (2) assume GC is run
>>>>>>>            // Note: The atomic section can be large and blocking,
>>>>>>>            // thus, inhibiting a GC run is not an option.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>            // (3) End of the atomic section (tx end):
>>>>>>>            // 1. In case of abort: restore old value
>>>>>>>            // 2. Release lock (obtained via reference to x)
>>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>>      }
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How can I assure that the reference to x in the undo log that I
>>>>>>> made at
>>>>>>> (1) remains valid at (3), even though a GC run may occur at (2)?
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>> My making sure the GC sees everything in the undo log. The
>>>>>> details will
>>>>> depend on how you propose to implement that log.
>>>>>>> thought that Handles (share/vm/runtime/handles.hpp) may be an
>>>>>>> option, but I might have misunderstood what they are used for. I
>>>>>>> can of course
>>>>>> Handles are used inside the VM to protect oops when we need to
>>>>>> use them
>>>>> across calls that might lead to safepoint checks and thus to GC occurring.
>>>>>>> make the undo log in the managed heap as well, but I hoped that
>>>>>>> this can be done directly in the JVM.
>>>>>> There are a number of ways to do this. If your log is a native VM
>>>>>> data
>>>>> structure then it might store Handles. Or you could make the log a
>>>>> GC root and make it known to the GC, and store oops directly.
>>>>>> Or you could implement it all in Java - which is probably a lot
>>>>>> simpler,
>>>>> albeit likely less performant.
>>>>>> David
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 9. März 2017, 21:12, um 21:12, "Jon V."
>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
>>>>> schrieb:
>>>>>>>> Are you trying to build a transactional memory system for the
>>>>>>>> JVM or your own Java code?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:33 PM Christian
>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I need this for an undo log of a transactional memory system
>>>>>>>>> with pessimistic locking/eager version management.
>>>>>>>>> Am 9. März 2017, um 19:00, "Jon V." <[hidden email]> schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you clarify what you mean by Undo and why you think this
>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> done at the VM level so we can better understand the request.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you don't want something to be garbage collected then
>>>>>>>>> simply don't dereference it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 12:38 PM Christian Hagedorn
>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I want to implement an undo functionality and thus need to
>>>>>>>>> access an
>>>>>>>> oop
>>>>>>>>> even when it is out of scope in the Java code. How can I pin
>>>>>>>>> such an
>>>>>>>> oop to
>>>>>>>>> avoid garbage collection of its used memory?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>



 

Loading...