JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
22 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Muneer Kolarkunnu

 

JDK 9 ea build 151 test results are now available at
http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/9/testresults.html

The jdk test results contain 5 differences from the build 150 test results. There are 2
testcase failures, these failures are under investigation.

0: /home/jtest/merge9/150/jdk/JTwork  pass: 6,116; fail: 7; not run: 2,233

1: /home/jtest/merge9/151/jdk/JTwork  pass: 6,118; fail: 9; not run: 2,233

 

0      1      Test

---    pass   java/net/NetworkInterface/SubNetworkInterfaceTest.java

---    pass   java/util/TimeZone/Bug8167143.java

pass   fail   java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java

---    fail   java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java#id1

---    pass   javax/sound/sampled/Clip/OpenNonIntegralNumberOfSampleframes.java

 

5 differences

 

The hotspot test results contain 10 differences from the build 150 test results. There is 1
testcase failure, this failure is under investigation.

0: /home/jtest/merge9/150/hotspot/JTwork  pass: 1,418; fail: 6; error: 1; not run: 57

1: /home/jtest/merge9/151/hotspot/JTwork  pass: 1,418; fail: 6; error: 3; not run: 56

 

0      1      Test

---    pass   compiler/c2/Test7005594.java

pass   ---    compiler/c2/cr7005594/Test7005594.java

---    pass   compiler/floatingpoint/TestFMABrokenC1RegAlloc.java

pass   fail   gc/TestNUMAPageSize.java

pass   error  runtime/Thread/ThreadPriorities.java

pass   error  runtime/Thread/TooSmallStackSize.java

fail   pass   runtime/modules/IgnoreModulePropertiesTest.java

---    pass   serviceability/dcmd/jvmti/LoadAgentDcmdTest.java

pass   ---    serviceability/jvmti/ExceptionCaughtOutOfPhase/ExceptionCaughtOutOfPhaseTest.java

---    pass   serviceability/sa/TestHeapDumpForInvokeDynamic.java

 

10 differences

 

The langtools test results contain 6 differences from the build 150 test results.

No new testcase failures found.

0: /home/jtest/merge9/150/langtools/JTwork  pass: 3,540; fail: 4; not run: 291

1: /home/jtest/merge9/151/langtools/JTwork  pass: 3,542; not run: 299

 

0      1      Test

---    pass   tools/javac/classreader/8171132/BadConstantValue.java

---    pass   tools/javac/lambda/8169091/T8169091.java

fail   ---    tools/javac/modules/T8159439/NPEForModuleInfoWithNonZeroSuperClassTest.java

fail   ---    tools/sjavac/ApiExtraction.java

fail   ---    tools/sjavac/ClasspathDependencies.java

fail   ---    tools/sjavac/IgnoreSymbolFile.java

 

6 differences

 

The nashorn test result is available at
http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/9/archives/151/emailable-report.html

-- 
Regards,
Abdul Muneer
Quality Engineer
Oracle, Bangalore, India 

 

 

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Martin Buchholz-3


On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Muneer Kolarkunnu <[hidden email]> wrote:


pass   fail   java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java

---    fail   java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java#id1

I'm maintaining java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase, but there is no information here for me to diagnose the problem.
---
Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does this report only include one platform?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland



On 12/01/2017 19:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:


On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Muneer Kolarkunnu <[hidden email]> wrote:


pass   fail   java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java

---    fail   java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java#id1

I'm maintaining java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase, but there is no information here for me to diagnose the problem.
---
Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does this report only include one platform?
Martin , as part of the quality outreach we discussed with jugs what platform they would like to see posted - Linux was the
platform of choice. We do run tests on all the other platforms internally,however posting one platform is a resource
constraint.

Muneer will log a bug for the failing test.

Rgds,Rory

-- 
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland 
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Muneer Kolarkunnu

Hi Martin,

 

I logged a bug, JDK-8172781 for the same and attached the logs. It is in Linux x64 environment.

 

Regards,

Muneer

 

From: Rory O'Donnell
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 4:08 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

 

 

 

On 12/01/2017 19:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:

 

 

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Muneer Kolarkunnu <[hidden email]> wrote:



pass   fail   java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java

---    fail   java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java#id1

 

I'm maintaining java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase, but there is no information here for me to diagnose the problem.

---

Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does this report only include one platform?

Martin , as part of the quality outreach we discussed with jugs what platform they would like to see posted - Linux was the
platform of choice. We do run tests on all the other platforms internally,however posting one platform is a resource
constraint.

Muneer will log a bug for the failing test.

Rgds,Rory


-- 
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland 
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

dalibor topic-2
In reply to this post by Martin Buchholz-3
On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does this report only include
> one platform?

It would be rather nice to see more people run the OpenJDK jtreg tests
on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of their choice and post the
results regularly.

The great thing about these tests is that it doesn't have to be someone
at Oracle doing all the running and all the posting.

cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher

<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Martijn Verburg
Hi all,

The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for some of the more common platforms.  This will be for R&D and academic research purposes only.

If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would like to help then please let me know!

Cheers,
Martijn

On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic <[hidden email]> wrote:
On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does this report only include
one platform?

It would be rather nice to see more people run the OpenJDK jtreg tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of their choice and post the results regularly.

The great thing about these tests is that it doesn't have to be someone at Oracle doing all the running and all the posting.

cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: <a href="tel:%2B494089091214" value="+494089091214" target="_blank">+494089091214 <tel:<a href="tel:%2B494089091214" value="+494089091214" target="_blank">+494089091214> | Mobile: <a href="tel:%2B491737185961" value="+491737185961" target="_blank">+491737185961
<tel:<a href="tel:%2B491737185961" value="+491737185961" target="_blank">+491737185961>

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher

<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Mani Sarkar
Is this improvising the existing build farm already on Cloudbees or setting up a whole new one.

Why is the choice Jenkins, any rationale behind it?

On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 13:08 Martijn Verburg, <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for some of the more
common platforms.  This will be for R&D and academic research purposes only.

If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would like to help then
please let me know!

Cheers,
Martijn

On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
>> Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does this report only include
>> one platform?
>>
>
> It would be rather nice to see more people run the OpenJDK jtreg tests on
> their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of their choice and post the results
> regularly.
>
> The great thing about these tests is that it doesn't have to be someone at
> Oracle doing all the running and all the posting.
>
> cheers,
> dalibor topic
> --
> <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
> Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
> <tel:+491737185961>
>
> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>
> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>
> Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
> Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>
> <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
> practices and products that help protect the environment
>
--
@theNeomatrix369  |  Blog  |  LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs)
Meet-a-Project - MutabilityDetector  |  Bitbucket  |  Github  |  LinkedIn
Come to Devoxx UK 2017: http://www.devoxx.co.uk/

Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Stuart Monteith
In reply to this post by Martijn Verburg
Hello,
        I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK on ARM's 64-bit
Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing results to the
aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on
http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would be a means
to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a method to
collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common set formats
for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change in, say,
x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for everyone.

Best regards,
   Stuart


On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for some of the
> more common platforms.  This will be for R&D and academic research
> purposes only.
>
> If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would like to help
> then please let me know!
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic <[hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>     On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
>         Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does this report only
>         include
>         one platform?
>
>
>     It would be rather nice to see more people run the OpenJDK jtreg
>     tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of their choice and
>     post the results regularly.
>
>     The great thing about these tests is that it doesn't have to be
>     someone at Oracle doing all the running and all the posting.
>
>     cheers,
>     dalibor topic
>     --
>     <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
>     Phone: +494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:+494089091214
>     <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: +491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>     <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>
>     ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>
>     ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>     Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>     Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>
>     Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>     Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
>     Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>     Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>
>     <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>     <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>> Oracle is committed to developing
>     practices and products that help protect the environment
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Jonathan Gibbons
If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output, there's a
related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to generate combined
reports.  It can compare either full work directories, or the
report/text/summary.txt files. The latter may be sufficient in this case.

-- Jon


On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote:

> Hello,
> I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK on ARM's 64-bit
> Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing results to the
> aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on
> http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would be a means
> to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a method to
> collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common set formats
> for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change in, say,
> x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for everyone.
>
> Best regards,
>     Stuart
>
>
> On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for some of the
>> more common platforms.  This will be for R&D and academic research
>> purposes only.
>>
>> If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would like to help
>> then please let me know!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic <[hidden email]
>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>
>>      On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>>
>>          Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does this report only
>>          include
>>          one platform?
>>
>>
>>      It would be rather nice to see more people run the OpenJDK jtreg
>>      tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of their choice and
>>      post the results regularly.
>>
>>      The great thing about these tests is that it doesn't have to be
>>      someone at Oracle doing all the running and all the posting.
>>
>>      cheers,
>>      dalibor topic
>>      --
>>      <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
>>      Phone: +494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:+494089091214
>>      <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: +491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>      <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>>
>>      ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>>
>>      ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>      Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>>      Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>>
>>      Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>>      Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
>>      Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>>      Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>
>>      <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>      <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>> Oracle is committed to developing
>>      practices and products that help protect the environment
>>
>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Martijn Verburg
Hi all,

I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could tackle this

Cheers,
Martijn

On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons <[hidden email]> wrote:
If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output, there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to generate combined reports.  It can compare either full work directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The latter may be sufficient in this case.

-- Jon



On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote:
Hello,
        I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK on ARM's 64-bit
Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing results to the
aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on
http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would be a means
to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a method to
collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common set formats
for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change in, say,
x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for everyone.

Best regards,
    Stuart


On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Hi all,

The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for some of the
more common platforms.  This will be for R&D and academic research
purposes only.

If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would like to help
then please let me know!

Cheers,
Martijn

On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic <[hidden email]
<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:

     On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:

         Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does this report only
         include
         one platform?


     It would be rather nice to see more people run the OpenJDK jtreg
     tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of their choice and
     post the results regularly.

     The great thing about these tests is that it doesn't have to be
     someone at Oracle doing all the running and all the posting.

     cheers,
     dalibor topic
     --
     <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
     Phone: <a href="tel:%2B494089091214" value="+494089091214" target="_blank">+494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:<a href="tel:%2B494089091214" value="+494089091214" target="_blank">+494089091214
     <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: <a href="tel:%2B491737185961" value="+491737185961" target="_blank">+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
     <tel:<a href="tel:%2B491737185961" value="+491737185961" target="_blank">+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>>

     ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg

     ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
     Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
     Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

     Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
     Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
     Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
     Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher

     <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
     <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>> Oracle is committed to developing
     practices and products that help protect the environment




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Martijn Verburg
To complete this old thread,

We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of the supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk

If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a walkthrough, please let me know!

Cheers,
Martijn

On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could tackle this

Cheers,
Martijn

On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons <[hidden email]> wrote:
If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output, there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to generate combined reports.  It can compare either full work directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The latter may be sufficient in this case.

-- Jon



On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote:
Hello,
        I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK on ARM's 64-bit
Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing results to the
aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on
http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would be a means
to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a method to
collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common set formats
for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change in, say,
x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for everyone.

Best regards,
    Stuart


On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Hi all,

The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for some of the
more common platforms.  This will be for R&D and academic research
purposes only.

If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would like to help
then please let me know!

Cheers,
Martijn

On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic <[hidden email]
<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:

     On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:

         Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does this report only
         include
         one platform?


     It would be rather nice to see more people run the OpenJDK jtreg
     tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of their choice and
     post the results regularly.

     The great thing about these tests is that it doesn't have to be
     someone at Oracle doing all the running and all the posting.

     cheers,
     dalibor topic
     --
     <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
     Phone: <a href="tel:%2B494089091214" value="+494089091214" target="_blank">+494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:<a href="tel:%2B494089091214" value="+494089091214" target="_blank">+494089091214
     <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: <a href="tel:%2B491737185961" value="+491737185961" target="_blank">+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
     <tel:<a href="tel:%2B491737185961" value="+491737185961" target="_blank">+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>>

     ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg

     ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
     Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
     Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

     Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
     Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
     Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
     Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher

     <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
     <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>> Oracle is committed to developing
     practices and products that help protect the environment





Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

dalibor topic-2
Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at
https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/ .

It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of the
test results regularly to this list as well.

cheers,
dalibor topic

On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote:

> To complete this old thread,
>
> We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a
> corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of the
> supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk
>
> If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a
> walkthrough, please let me know!
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg <[hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with
>     the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could
>     tackle this
>
>     Cheers,
>     Martijn
>
>     On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons
>     <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>
>     wrote:
>
>         If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output,
>         there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to
>         generate combined reports.  It can compare either full work
>         directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The latter
>         may be sufficient in this case.
>
>         -- Jon
>
>
>
>         On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote:
>
>             Hello,
>                      I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK
>             on ARM's 64-bit
>             Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing
>             results to the
>             aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on
>             http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would
>             be a means
>             to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a
>             method to
>             collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common
>             set formats
>             for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change
>             in, say,
>             x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for
>             everyone.
>
>             Best regards,
>                  Stuart
>
>
>             On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>
>                 Hi all,
>
>                 The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for
>                 some of the
>                 more common platforms.  This will be for R&D and
>                 academic research
>                 purposes only.
>
>                 If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would
>                 like to help
>                 then please let me know!
>
>                 Cheers,
>                 Martijn
>
>                 On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic
>                 <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>                 <mailto:[hidden email]
>                 <mailto:[hidden email]>>> wrote:
>
>                       On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
>                           Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does
>                 this report only
>                           include
>                           one platform?
>
>
>                       It would be rather nice to see more people run the
>                 OpenJDK jtreg
>                       tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of
>                 their choice and
>                       post the results regularly.
>
>                       The great thing about these tests is that it
>                 doesn't have to be
>                       someone at Oracle doing all the running and all
>                 the posting.
>
>                       cheers,
>                       dalibor topic
>                       --
>                       <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal
>                 Product Manager
>                       Phone: +494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214>
>                 <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:+494089091214
>                 <tel:%2B494089091214>
>                       <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: +491737185961
>                 <tel:%2B491737185961> <tel:%2B491737185961>
>                       <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>                 <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>
>                       ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 |
>                 22761 Hamburg
>
>                       ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>                       Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>                       Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>
>                       Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>                       Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
>                       Handelsregister der Handelskammer
>                 Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>                       Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan
>                 Schultheiss, Val Maher
>
>                       <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>                 <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>
>                       <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>                 <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>>> Oracle is committed
>                 to developing
>                       practices and products that help protect the
>                 environment
>
>
>
>
>

--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher

<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Martijn Verburg
Hi Dalibor,

That's a really good idea.  Any objections to having an automated system sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule?

Cheers,
Martijn

On 22 November 2017 at 13:35, dalibor topic <[hidden email]> wrote:
Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/ .

It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of the test results regularly to this list as well.

cheers,
dalibor topic

On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote:
To complete this old thread,

We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of the supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk

If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a walkthrough, please let me know!

Cheers,
Martijn

On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:

    Hi all,

    I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with
    the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could
    tackle this

    Cheers,
    Martijn

    On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons
    <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>
    wrote:

        If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output,
        there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to
        generate combined reports.  It can compare either full work
        directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The latter
        may be sufficient in this case.

        -- Jon



        On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote:

            Hello,
                     I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK
            on ARM's 64-bit
            Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing
            results to the
            aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on
            http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would
            be a means
            to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a
            method to
            collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common
            set formats
            for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change
            in, say,
            x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for
            everyone.

            Best regards,
                 Stuart


            On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote:

                Hi all,

                The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for
                some of the
                more common platforms.  This will be for R&D and
                academic research
                purposes only.

                If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would
                like to help
                then please let me know!

                Cheers,
                Martijn

                On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic
                <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
                <mailto:[hidden email]
                <mailto:[hidden email]>>> wrote:

                      On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:

                          Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does
                this report only
                          include
                          one platform?


                      It would be rather nice to see more people run the
                OpenJDK jtreg
                      tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of
                their choice and
                      post the results regularly.

                      The great thing about these tests is that it
                doesn't have to be
                      someone at Oracle doing all the running and all
                the posting.

                      cheers,
                      dalibor topic
                      --
                      <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal
                Product Manager
                      Phone: <a href="tel:%2B494089091214" value="+494089091214" target="_blank">+494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214>
                <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:<a href="tel:%2B494089091214" value="+494089091214" target="_blank">+494089091214
                <tel:%2B494089091214>
                      <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: <a href="tel:%2B491737185961" value="+491737185961" target="_blank">+491737185961
                <tel:%2B491737185961> <tel:%2B491737185961>
                      <tel:<a href="tel:%2B491737185961" value="+491737185961" target="_blank">+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
                <tel:%2B491737185961>>

                      ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 |
                22761 Hamburg

                      ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
                      Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
                      Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

                      Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
                      Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
                      Handelsregister der Handelskammer
                Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
                      Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan
                Schultheiss, Val Maher

                      <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
                <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>
                      <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
                <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>>> Oracle is committed
                to developing
                      practices and products that help protect the
                environment






--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: <a href="tel:%2B494089091214" value="+494089091214" target="_blank">+494089091214 <tel:<a href="tel:%2B494089091214" value="+494089091214" target="_blank">+494089091214> | Mobile: <a href="tel:%2B491737185961" value="+491737185961" target="_blank">+491737185961
<tel:<a href="tel:%2B491737185961" value="+491737185961" target="_blank">+491737185961>

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher

<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Volker Simonis
Hi Dalibor,

could you please update:

http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/10/docs/howtoruntests.html

to conform to the latest, consolidated repository. The description
still refers to the various sub-repos (jdk/test, hotspot/test, etc..)
which are gone now.

Thank you and best regards,
Volker


On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Martijn Verburg
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Dalibor,
>
> That's a really good idea.  Any objections to having an automated system
> sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule?
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On 22 November 2017 at 13:35, dalibor topic <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at
>> https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/ .
>>
>> It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of the
>> test results regularly to this list as well.
>>
>> cheers,
>> dalibor topic
>>
>> On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>>
>>> To complete this old thread,
>>>
>>> We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a
>>> corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of the
>>> supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk
>>>
>>> If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a
>>> walkthrough, please let me know!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martijn
>>>
>>> On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg <[hidden email]
>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi all,
>>>
>>>     I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with
>>>     the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could
>>>     tackle this
>>>
>>>     Cheers,
>>>     Martijn
>>>
>>>     On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons
>>>     <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>
>>>     wrote:
>>>
>>>         If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output,
>>>         there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to
>>>         generate combined reports.  It can compare either full work
>>>         directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The latter
>>>         may be sufficient in this case.
>>>
>>>         -- Jon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote:
>>>
>>>             Hello,
>>>                      I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK
>>>             on ARM's 64-bit
>>>             Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing
>>>             results to the
>>>             aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on
>>>             http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would
>>>             be a means
>>>             to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a
>>>             method to
>>>             collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common
>>>             set formats
>>>             for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change
>>>             in, say,
>>>             x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for
>>>             everyone.
>>>
>>>             Best regards,
>>>                  Stuart
>>>
>>>
>>>             On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>>
>>>                 Hi all,
>>>
>>>                 The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for
>>>                 some of the
>>>                 more common platforms.  This will be for R&D and
>>>                 academic research
>>>                 purposes only.
>>>
>>>                 If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would
>>>                 like to help
>>>                 then please let me know!
>>>
>>>                 Cheers,
>>>                 Martijn
>>>
>>>                 On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic
>>>                 <[hidden email]
>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>>                 <mailto:[hidden email]
>>>                 <mailto:[hidden email]>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>                       On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>>>
>>>                           Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does
>>>                 this report only
>>>                           include
>>>                           one platform?
>>>
>>>
>>>                       It would be rather nice to see more people run the
>>>                 OpenJDK jtreg
>>>                       tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of
>>>                 their choice and
>>>                       post the results regularly.
>>>
>>>                       The great thing about these tests is that it
>>>                 doesn't have to be
>>>                       someone at Oracle doing all the running and all
>>>                 the posting.
>>>
>>>                       cheers,
>>>                       dalibor topic
>>>                       --
>>>                       <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal
>>>                 Product Manager
>>>                       Phone: +494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214>
>>>                 <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:+494089091214
>>>                 <tel:%2B494089091214>
>>>                       <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: +491737185961
>>>                 <tel:%2B491737185961> <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>>                       <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>>                 <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>>>
>>>                       ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 |
>>>                 22761 Hamburg
>>>
>>>                       ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>>                       Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>>>                       Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>>>
>>>                       Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>>>                       Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht,
>>> Niederlande
>>>                       Handelsregister der Handelskammer
>>>                 Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>>>                       Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan
>>>                 Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>>
>>>                       <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>>                 <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>
>>>                       <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>>                 <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>>> Oracle is committed
>>>                 to developing
>>>                       practices and products that help protect the
>>>                 environment
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
>> Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
>> <tel:+491737185961>
>>
>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>>
>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>>
>> Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>
>> <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
>> practices and products that help protect the environment
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland
Volker,

We added Note 3 to http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/10/

earlier this week, we should have updated the "howto" also, will get
that done shortly.

We are still evaluating the most suitable hotspot test group(s), bear
with us while we get this sorted.


Rgds,Rory


On 23/11/2017 08:10, Volker Simonis wrote:

> Hi Dalibor,
>
> could you please update:
>
> http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/10/docs/howtoruntests.html
>
> to conform to the latest, consolidated repository. The description
> still refers to the various sub-repos (jdk/test, hotspot/test, etc..)
> which are gone now.
>
> Thank you and best regards,
> Volker
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Martijn Verburg
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi Dalibor,
>>
>> That's a really good idea.  Any objections to having an automated system
>> sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 22 November 2017 at 13:35, dalibor topic <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>> Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at
>>> https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/ .
>>>
>>> It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of the
>>> test results regularly to this list as well.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> dalibor topic
>>>
>>> On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>>> To complete this old thread,
>>>>
>>>> We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a
>>>> corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of the
>>>> supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk
>>>>
>>>> If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a
>>>> walkthrough, please let me know!
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Martijn
>>>>
>>>> On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg <[hidden email]
>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>      Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>      I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with
>>>>      the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could
>>>>      tackle this
>>>>
>>>>      Cheers,
>>>>      Martijn
>>>>
>>>>      On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons
>>>>      <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>
>>>>      wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output,
>>>>          there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to
>>>>          generate combined reports.  It can compare either full work
>>>>          directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The latter
>>>>          may be sufficient in this case.
>>>>
>>>>          -- Jon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>              Hello,
>>>>                       I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK
>>>>              on ARM's 64-bit
>>>>              Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing
>>>>              results to the
>>>>              aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on
>>>>              http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would
>>>>              be a means
>>>>              to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a
>>>>              method to
>>>>              collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common
>>>>              set formats
>>>>              for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change
>>>>              in, say,
>>>>              x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for
>>>>              everyone.
>>>>
>>>>              Best regards,
>>>>                   Stuart
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>              On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                  Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>                  The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for
>>>>                  some of the
>>>>                  more common platforms.  This will be for R&D and
>>>>                  academic research
>>>>                  purposes only.
>>>>
>>>>                  If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would
>>>>                  like to help
>>>>                  then please let me know!
>>>>
>>>>                  Cheers,
>>>>                  Martijn
>>>>
>>>>                  On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic
>>>>                  <[hidden email]
>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>>>                  <mailto:[hidden email]
>>>>                  <mailto:[hidden email]>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                        On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                            Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does
>>>>                  this report only
>>>>                            include
>>>>                            one platform?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                        It would be rather nice to see more people run the
>>>>                  OpenJDK jtreg
>>>>                        tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of
>>>>                  their choice and
>>>>                        post the results regularly.
>>>>
>>>>                        The great thing about these tests is that it
>>>>                  doesn't have to be
>>>>                        someone at Oracle doing all the running and all
>>>>                  the posting.
>>>>
>>>>                        cheers,
>>>>                        dalibor topic
>>>>                        --
>>>>                        <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal
>>>>                  Product Manager
>>>>                        Phone: +494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214>
>>>>                  <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:+494089091214
>>>>                  <tel:%2B494089091214>
>>>>                        <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: +491737185961
>>>>                  <tel:%2B491737185961> <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>>>                        <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>>>                  <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>>>>
>>>>                        ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 |
>>>>                  22761 Hamburg
>>>>
>>>>                        ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>>>                        Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>>>>                        Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>>>>
>>>>                        Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>>>>                        Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht,
>>>> Niederlande
>>>>                        Handelsregister der Handelskammer
>>>>                  Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>>>>                        Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan
>>>>                  Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>>>
>>>>                        <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>>>                  <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>
>>>>                        <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>>>                  <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>>> Oracle is committed
>>>>                  to developing
>>>>                        practices and products that help protect the
>>>>                  environment
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
>>> Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
>>> <tel:+491737185961>
>>>
>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>>>
>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>>>
>>> Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
>>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>>
>>> <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
>>> practices and products that help protect the environment
>>

--
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA, Dublin,Ireland

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

dalibor topic-2
In reply to this post by Martijn Verburg


On 22.11.2017 21:44, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> Hi Dalibor,
>
> That's a really good idea.  Any objections to having an automated system
> sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule?

No objections from me, as long as it is configured to send mail for
tagged builds (as Oracle does for early access builds on Oracle Linux),
rather than on each commit, or some other more frequent schedule. I.e.
once a week is fine, as it allows and encourages comparison between
different builds & platforms, multiple times per day is probably too noisy.

Rory?

cheers,
dalibor topic

>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On 22 November 2017 at 13:35, dalibor topic <[hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at
>     https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/
>     <https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/> .
>
>     It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of
>     the test results regularly to this list as well.
>
>     cheers,
>     dalibor topic
>
>     On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>
>         To complete this old thread,
>
>         We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a
>         corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of
>         the supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk
>         <https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk>
>
>         If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a
>         walkthrough, please let me know!
>
>         Cheers,
>         Martijn
>
>         On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg
>         <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>         <mailto:[hidden email]
>         <mailto:[hidden email]>>> wrote:
>
>              Hi all,
>
>              I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of
>         you with
>              the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how
>         we could
>              tackle this
>
>              Cheers,
>              Martijn
>
>              On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons
>              <[hidden email]
>         <mailto:[hidden email]>
>         <mailto:[hidden email]
>         <mailto:[hidden email]>>>
>              wrote:
>
>                  If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output,
>                  there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be
>         used to
>                  generate combined reports.  It can compare either full work
>                  directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The
>         latter
>                  may be sufficient in this case.
>
>                  -- Jon
>
>
>
>                  On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote:
>
>                      Hello,
>                               I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on
>         OpenJDK
>                      on ARM's 64-bit
>                      Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing
>                      results to the
>                      aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on
>         http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would
>                      be a means
>                      to collate results across all the platforms, with
>         perhaps a
>                      method to
>                      collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure
>         a common
>                      set formats
>                      for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that
>         a change
>                      in, say,
>                      x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be
>         useful for
>                      everyone.
>
>                      Best regards,
>                           Stuart
>
>
>                      On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>
>                          Hi all,
>
>                          The LJC has plans to do this with a small build
>         farm for
>                          some of the
>                          more common platforms.  This will be for R&D and
>                          academic research
>                          purposes only.
>
>                          If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience
>         and would
>                          like to help
>                          then please let me know!
>
>                          Cheers,
>                          Martijn
>
>                          On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic
>                          <[hidden email]
>         <mailto:[hidden email]>
>         <mailto:[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>
>                          <mailto:[hidden email]
>         <mailto:[hidden email]>
>                          <mailto:[hidden email]
>         <mailto:[hidden email]>>>> wrote:
>
>                                On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
>                                    Oracle runs tests on many platforms;
>         why does
>                          this report only
>                                    include
>                                    one platform?
>
>
>                                It would be rather nice to see more
>         people run the
>                          OpenJDK jtreg
>                                tests on their own OpenJDK builds on
>         platforms of
>                          their choice and
>                                post the results regularly.
>
>                                The great thing about these tests is that it
>                          doesn't have to be
>                                someone at Oracle doing all the running
>         and all
>                          the posting.
>
>                                cheers,
>                                dalibor topic
>                                --
>                                <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic |
>         Principal
>                          Product Manager
>                                Phone: +494089091214
>         <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:%2B494089091214>
>                          <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:+494089091214
>         <tel:%2B494089091214>
>                          <tel:%2B494089091214>
>                                <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile:
>         +491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>                          <tel:%2B491737185961> <tel:%2B491737185961>
>                                <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>         <tel:%2B491737185961>
>                          <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>
>                                ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG |
>         Kühnehöfe 5 |
>                          22761 Hamburg
>
>                                ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>                                Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>                                Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA
>         95603
>
>                                Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland
>         Verwaltung B.V.
>                                Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht,
>         Niederlande
>                                Handelsregister der Handelskammer
>                          Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>                                Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan
>                          Schultheiss, Val Maher
>
>                                <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>         <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>
>                          <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>         <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>>
>                                <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>         <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>
>                          <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>         <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>>>> Oracle is committed
>                          to developing
>                                practices and products that help protect the
>                          environment
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
>     Phone: +494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:+494089091214
>     <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: +491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>     <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>
>     ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>
>     ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>     Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>     Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>
>     Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>     Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
>     Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>     Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>
>     <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>     <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>> Oracle is committed to developing
>     practices and products that help protect the environment
>
>

--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher

<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland


On 23/11/2017 09:23, dalibor topic wrote:

>
>
> On 22.11.2017 21:44, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>> Hi Dalibor,
>>
>> That's a really good idea.  Any objections to having an automated
>> system sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule?
>
> No objections from me, as long as it is configured to send mail for
> tagged builds (as Oracle does for early access builds on Oracle
> Linux), rather than on each commit, or some other more frequent
> schedule. I.e. once a week is fine, as it allows and encourages
> comparison between different builds & platforms, multiple times per
> day is probably too noisy.
>
> Rory?
Agreed, once a week seems like a good interval .

Rgds,Rory

>
> cheers,
> dalibor topic
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 22 November 2017 at 13:35, dalibor topic <[hidden email]
>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>
>>     Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at
>>     https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/
>>     <https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/> .
>>
>>     It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of
>>     the test results regularly to this list as well.
>>
>>     cheers,
>>     dalibor topic
>>
>>     On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>
>>         To complete this old thread,
>>
>>         We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a
>>         corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of
>>         the supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk
>>         <https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk>
>>
>>         If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a
>>         walkthrough, please let me know!
>>
>>         Cheers,
>>         Martijn
>>
>>         On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg
>>         <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>         <mailto:[hidden email]
>>         <mailto:[hidden email]>>> wrote:
>>
>>              Hi all,
>>
>>              I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of
>>         you with
>>              the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how
>>         we could
>>              tackle this
>>
>>              Cheers,
>>              Martijn
>>
>>              On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons
>>              <[hidden email]
>>         <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>         <mailto:[hidden email]
>>         <mailto:[hidden email]>>>
>>              wrote:
>>
>>                  If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg
>> output,
>>                  there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be
>>         used to
>>                  generate combined reports.  It can compare either
>> full work
>>                  directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The
>>         latter
>>                  may be sufficient in this case.
>>
>>                  -- Jon
>>
>>
>>
>>                  On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote:
>>
>>                      Hello,
>>                               I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on
>>         OpenJDK
>>                      on ARM's 64-bit
>>                      Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64
>> testing
>>                      results to the
>>                      aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on
>>         http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would
>>                      be a means
>>                      to collate results across all the platforms, with
>>         perhaps a
>>                      method to
>>                      collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure
>>         a common
>>                      set formats
>>                      for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that
>>         a change
>>                      in, say,
>>                      x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be
>>         useful for
>>                      everyone.
>>
>>                      Best regards,
>>                           Stuart
>>
>>
>>                      On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>
>>                          Hi all,
>>
>>                          The LJC has plans to do this with a small build
>>         farm for
>>                          some of the
>>                          more common platforms.  This will be for R&D
>> and
>>                          academic research
>>                          purposes only.
>>
>>                          If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience
>>         and would
>>                          like to help
>>                          then please let me know!
>>
>>                          Cheers,
>>                          Martijn
>>
>>                          On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic
>>                          <[hidden email]
>>         <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>         <mailto:[hidden email]
>> <mailto:[hidden email]>>
>>                          <mailto:[hidden email]
>>         <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>                          <mailto:[hidden email]
>>         <mailto:[hidden email]>>>> wrote:
>>
>>                                On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz
>> wrote:
>>
>>                                    Oracle runs tests on many platforms;
>>         why does
>>                          this report only
>>                                    include
>>                                    one platform?
>>
>>
>>                                It would be rather nice to see more
>>         people run the
>>                          OpenJDK jtreg
>>                                tests on their own OpenJDK builds on
>>         platforms of
>>                          their choice and
>>                                post the results regularly.
>>
>>                                The great thing about these tests is
>> that it
>>                          doesn't have to be
>>                                someone at Oracle doing all the running
>>         and all
>>                          the posting.
>>
>>                                cheers,
>>                                dalibor topic
>>                                --
>>                                <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic |
>>         Principal
>>                          Product Manager
>>                                Phone: +494089091214
>>         <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:%2B494089091214>
>>                          <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:+494089091214
>>         <tel:%2B494089091214>
>>                          <tel:%2B494089091214>
>>                                <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile:
>>         +491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>                          <tel:%2B491737185961> <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>                                <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>         <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>                          <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>>
>>                                ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG |
>>         Kühnehöfe 5 |
>>                          22761 Hamburg
>>
>>                                ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>                                Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992
>> München
>>                                Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA
>>         95603
>>
>>                                Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland
>>         Verwaltung B.V.
>>                                Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht,
>>         Niederlande
>>                                Handelsregister der Handelskammer
>>                          Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>>                                Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der
>> Ven, Jan
>>                          Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>
>>  <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>         <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>
>>                          <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>         <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>>
>>  <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>         <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>
>>                          <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>         <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>>>> Oracle is committed
>>                          to developing
>>                                practices and products that help
>> protect the
>>                          environment
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     --     <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product
>> Manager
>>     Phone: +494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:+494089091214
>>     <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: +491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>     <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>>
>>     ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>>
>>     ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>     Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>>     Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>>
>>     Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>>     Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
>>     Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>>     Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>
>>     <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>     <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>> Oracle is committed to
>> developing
>>     practices and products that help protect the environment
>>
>>
>

--
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Muneer Kolarkunnu
In reply to this post by Volker Simonis
Hi Volker,

Thanks for the feedback.
I updated the page 'howtoruntests' to conform to the latest consolidated repository.

Regards,
Muneer

-----Original Message-----
From: Volker Simonis [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 1:40 PM
To: Martijn Verburg
Cc: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Hi Dalibor,

could you please update:

http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/10/docs/howtoruntests.html

to conform to the latest, consolidated repository. The description still refers to the various sub-repos (jdk/test, hotspot/test, etc..) which are gone now.

Thank you and best regards,
Volker


On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Martijn Verburg <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Dalibor,
>
> That's a really good idea.  Any objections to having an automated
> system sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule?
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On 22 November 2017 at 13:35, dalibor topic <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at
>> https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/ .
>>
>> It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of
>> the test results regularly to this list as well.
>>
>> cheers,
>> dalibor topic
>>
>> On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>>
>>> To complete this old thread,
>>>
>>> We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a
>>> corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of the
>>> supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk
>>>
>>> If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a
>>> walkthrough, please let me know!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martijn
>>>
>>> On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg
>>> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi all,
>>>
>>>     I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with
>>>     the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could
>>>     tackle this
>>>
>>>     Cheers,
>>>     Martijn
>>>
>>>     On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons
>>>     <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>
>>>     wrote:
>>>
>>>         If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output,
>>>         there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to
>>>         generate combined reports.  It can compare either full work
>>>         directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The latter
>>>         may be sufficient in this case.
>>>
>>>         -- Jon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote:
>>>
>>>             Hello,
>>>                      I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK
>>>             on ARM's 64-bit
>>>             Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing
>>>             results to the
>>>             aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on
>>>             http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would
>>>             be a means
>>>             to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a
>>>             method to
>>>             collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common
>>>             set formats
>>>             for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change
>>>             in, say,
>>>             x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for
>>>             everyone.
>>>
>>>             Best regards,
>>>                  Stuart
>>>
>>>
>>>             On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>>
>>>                 Hi all,
>>>
>>>                 The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for
>>>                 some of the
>>>                 more common platforms.  This will be for R&D and
>>>                 academic research
>>>                 purposes only.
>>>
>>>                 If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would
>>>                 like to help
>>>                 then please let me know!
>>>
>>>                 Cheers,
>>>                 Martijn
>>>
>>>                 On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic
>>>                 <[hidden email]
>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>>                 <mailto:[hidden email]
>>>                 <mailto:[hidden email]>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>                       On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>>>
>>>                           Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does
>>>                 this report only
>>>                           include
>>>                           one platform?
>>>
>>>
>>>                       It would be rather nice to see more people run the
>>>                 OpenJDK jtreg
>>>                       tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of
>>>                 their choice and
>>>                       post the results regularly.
>>>
>>>                       The great thing about these tests is that it
>>>                 doesn't have to be
>>>                       someone at Oracle doing all the running and all
>>>                 the posting.
>>>
>>>                       cheers,
>>>                       dalibor topic
>>>                       --
>>>                       <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal
>>>                 Product Manager
>>>                       Phone: +494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214>
>>>                 <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:+494089091214
>>>                 <tel:%2B494089091214>
>>>                       <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: +491737185961
>>>                 <tel:%2B491737185961> <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>>                       <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>>                 <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>>>
>>>                       ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 |
>>>                 22761 Hamburg
>>>
>>>                       ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>>                       Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>>>                       Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA
>>> 95603
>>>
>>>                       Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>>>                       Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht,
>>> Niederlande
>>>                       Handelsregister der Handelskammer
>>>                 Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>>>                       Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan
>>>                 Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>>
>>>                       <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>>                 <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>
>>>                       <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>>                 <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>>> Oracle is committed
>>>                 to developing
>>>                       practices and products that help protect the
>>>                 environment
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
>> Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
>> <tel:+491737185961>
>>
>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>>
>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>>
>> Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister
>> der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>
>> <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
>> practices and products that help protect the environment
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Volker Simonis
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Muneer Kolarkunnu
<[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Volker,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
> I updated the page 'howtoruntests' to conform to the latest consolidated repository.

Hi Muneer, Dalibor, Rory,

I see that the 'howtoruntests' has been updated at
http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/10/docs/howtoruntests.html
but unfortunately it is still not accurate.

In section "2.3 Running tests in test/hotspot" the command line should read:

$ jtreg -dir:{openjdk source top directory}/test/hotspot/jtreg
-verbose:summary -nativepath:{location of the hotspot test native
library} -exclude:{openjdk source top
directory}/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt -conc:auto -a
-ignore:quiet -timeoutFactor:5 -agentvm -testjdk:{location of the test
jdk} :hotspot_all_no_apps

(i.e. the arguments for '-dir' and '-exclude' require
"test/hotspot/jtreg" instead of "test/hotspot/jtreg")

I'd also like to suggest to add the following extra explanation as
footnotes to the sections 2.1 and 2.3:

2.1 Running tests in test/jdk
$ jtreg -dir:{openjdk source top directory}/test/jdk -verbose:summary
-nativepath:{location of the jdk test native library}
-exclude:{openjdk source top directory}/test/jdk/ProblemList.txt
-conc:2 -Xmx512m -a -ignore:quiet -timeoutFactor:5 -agentvm
-testjdk:{location of the test jdk} :jdk_stable

{location of the jdk test native library}: has to be generated at
build time of the test jdk by invoking "make test-image". Located in
the build directory under "images/test/jdk/jtreg/native/"

2.3 Running tests in test/hotspot
$ jtreg -dir:{openjdk source top directory}/test/hotspot/jtreg
-verbose:summary -nativepath:{location of the hotspot test native
library} -exclude:{openjdk source top
directory}/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt -conc:auto -a
-ignore:quiet -timeoutFactor:5 -agentvm -testjdk:{location of the test
jdk} :hotspot_all_no_apps

{location of the hotspot test native library}: has to be generated at
build time of the test jdk by invoking "make test-image". Located in
the build directory under "images/test/hotspot/jtreg/native/"

Without a properly specified "-nativepath" a lot of tests will fail
and most people probably won't know why.

Regards,
Volker

> Muneer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Volker Simonis [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 1:40 PM
> To: Martijn Verburg
> Cc: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available
>
> Hi Dalibor,
>
> could you please update:
>
> http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/10/docs/howtoruntests.html
>
> to conform to the latest, consolidated repository. The description still refers to the various sub-repos (jdk/test, hotspot/test, etc..) which are gone now.
>
> Thank you and best regards,
> Volker
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Martijn Verburg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi Dalibor,
>>
>> That's a really good idea.  Any objections to having an automated
>> system sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 22 November 2017 at 13:35, dalibor topic <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at
>>> https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/ .
>>>
>>> It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of
>>> the test results regularly to this list as well.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> dalibor topic
>>>
>>> On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> To complete this old thread,
>>>>
>>>> We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a
>>>> corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of the
>>>> supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk
>>>>
>>>> If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a
>>>> walkthrough, please let me know!
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Martijn
>>>>
>>>> On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg
>>>> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>     I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with
>>>>     the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could
>>>>     tackle this
>>>>
>>>>     Cheers,
>>>>     Martijn
>>>>
>>>>     On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons
>>>>     <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>
>>>>     wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output,
>>>>         there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to
>>>>         generate combined reports.  It can compare either full work
>>>>         directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The latter
>>>>         may be sufficient in this case.
>>>>
>>>>         -- Jon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             Hello,
>>>>                      I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK
>>>>             on ARM's 64-bit
>>>>             Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing
>>>>             results to the
>>>>             aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on
>>>>             http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would
>>>>             be a means
>>>>             to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a
>>>>             method to
>>>>             collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common
>>>>             set formats
>>>>             for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change
>>>>             in, say,
>>>>             x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for
>>>>             everyone.
>>>>
>>>>             Best regards,
>>>>                  Stuart
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>                 The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for
>>>>                 some of the
>>>>                 more common platforms.  This will be for R&D and
>>>>                 academic research
>>>>                 purposes only.
>>>>
>>>>                 If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would
>>>>                 like to help
>>>>                 then please let me know!
>>>>
>>>>                 Cheers,
>>>>                 Martijn
>>>>
>>>>                 On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic
>>>>                 <[hidden email]
>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>>>                 <mailto:[hidden email]
>>>>                 <mailto:[hidden email]>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                       On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                           Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does
>>>>                 this report only
>>>>                           include
>>>>                           one platform?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                       It would be rather nice to see more people run the
>>>>                 OpenJDK jtreg
>>>>                       tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of
>>>>                 their choice and
>>>>                       post the results regularly.
>>>>
>>>>                       The great thing about these tests is that it
>>>>                 doesn't have to be
>>>>                       someone at Oracle doing all the running and all
>>>>                 the posting.
>>>>
>>>>                       cheers,
>>>>                       dalibor topic
>>>>                       --
>>>>                       <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal
>>>>                 Product Manager
>>>>                       Phone: +494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214>
>>>>                 <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:+494089091214
>>>>                 <tel:%2B494089091214>
>>>>                       <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: +491737185961
>>>>                 <tel:%2B491737185961> <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>>>                       <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>>>                 <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>>>>
>>>>                       ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 |
>>>>                 22761 Hamburg
>>>>
>>>>                       ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>>>                       Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>>>>                       Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA
>>>> 95603
>>>>
>>>>                       Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>>>>                       Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht,
>>>> Niederlande
>>>>                       Handelsregister der Handelskammer
>>>>                 Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>>>>                       Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan
>>>>                 Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>>>
>>>>                       <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>>>                 <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>
>>>>                       <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>>>                 <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>>> Oracle is committed
>>>>                 to developing
>>>>                       practices and products that help protect the
>>>>                 environment
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
>>> Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
>>> <tel:+491737185961>
>>>
>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>>>
>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>>>
>>> Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister
>>> der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>>
>>> <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
>>> practices and products that help protect the environment
>>
>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

Muneer Kolarkunnu
Hi Volker,

I will incorporate your comments along with JDK10 build39 test results.
Thanks for your review and suggestions.

Regards,
Muneer

-----Original Message-----
From: Volker Simonis [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 8:49 PM
To: Muneer Kolarkunnu <[hidden email]>
Cc: [hidden email]; Rory O'Donnell <[hidden email]>; Dalibor Topic <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Muneer Kolarkunnu <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Volker,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
> I updated the page 'howtoruntests' to conform to the latest consolidated repository.

Hi Muneer, Dalibor, Rory,

I see that the 'howtoruntests' has been updated at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/10/docs/howtoruntests.html
but unfortunately it is still not accurate.

In section "2.3 Running tests in test/hotspot" the command line should read:

$ jtreg -dir:{openjdk source top directory}/test/hotspot/jtreg -verbose:summary -nativepath:{location of the hotspot test native library} -exclude:{openjdk source top directory}/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt -conc:auto -a -ignore:quiet -timeoutFactor:5 -agentvm -testjdk:{location of the test jdk} :hotspot_all_no_apps

(i.e. the arguments for '-dir' and '-exclude' require "test/hotspot/jtreg" instead of "test/hotspot/jtreg")

I'd also like to suggest to add the following extra explanation as footnotes to the sections 2.1 and 2.3:

2.1 Running tests in test/jdk
$ jtreg -dir:{openjdk source top directory}/test/jdk -verbose:summary -nativepath:{location of the jdk test native library} -exclude:{openjdk source top directory}/test/jdk/ProblemList.txt
-conc:2 -Xmx512m -a -ignore:quiet -timeoutFactor:5 -agentvm -testjdk:{location of the test jdk} :jdk_stable

{location of the jdk test native library}: has to be generated at build time of the test jdk by invoking "make test-image". Located in the build directory under "images/test/jdk/jtreg/native/"

2.3 Running tests in test/hotspot
$ jtreg -dir:{openjdk source top directory}/test/hotspot/jtreg -verbose:summary -nativepath:{location of the hotspot test native library} -exclude:{openjdk source top directory}/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt -conc:auto -a -ignore:quiet -timeoutFactor:5 -agentvm -testjdk:{location of the test jdk} :hotspot_all_no_apps

{location of the hotspot test native library}: has to be generated at build time of the test jdk by invoking "make test-image". Located in the build directory under "images/test/hotspot/jtreg/native/"

Without a properly specified "-nativepath" a lot of tests will fail and most people probably won't know why.

Regards,
Volker

> Muneer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Volker Simonis [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 1:40 PM
> To: Martijn Verburg
> Cc: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available
>
> Hi Dalibor,
>
> could you please update:
>
> http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/10/docs/howtoruntests.htm
> l
>
> to conform to the latest, consolidated repository. The description still refers to the various sub-repos (jdk/test, hotspot/test, etc..) which are gone now.
>
> Thank you and best regards,
> Volker
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Martijn Verburg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi Dalibor,
>>
>> That's a really good idea.  Any objections to having an automated
>> system sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 22 November 2017 at 13:35, dalibor topic
>> <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test results is at
>>> https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/OpenJDK%20tests/ .
>>>
>>> It'd be nice if someone from LJC or IBM would post a link/summary of
>>> the test results regularly to this list as well.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> dalibor topic
>>>
>>> On 21.11.2017 22:01, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> To complete this old thread,
>>>>
>>>> We now have a build farm at https://ci.adoptpenjdk.net with a
>>>> corresponding website at https://www.adoptopenjdk.net and all of
>>>> the supporting repos at https://www.github.com/adoptopenjdk
>>>>
>>>> If you'd like to join the community Slack or GitHub and get a
>>>> walkthrough, please let me know!
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Martijn
>>>>
>>>> On 19 January 2017 at 22:12, Martijn Verburg
>>>> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>     I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with
>>>>     the straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could
>>>>     tackle this
>>>>
>>>>     Cheers,
>>>>     Martijn
>>>>
>>>>     On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons
>>>>     <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>
>>>>     wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output,
>>>>         there's a related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to
>>>>         generate combined reports.  It can compare either full work
>>>>         directories, or the report/text/summary.txt files. The latter
>>>>         may be sufficient in this case.
>>>>
>>>>         -- Jon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         On 1/16/17 3:54 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             Hello,
>>>>                      I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK
>>>>             on ARM's 64-bit
>>>>             Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing
>>>>             results to the
>>>>             aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on
>>>>             http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would
>>>>             be a means
>>>>             to collate results across all the platforms, with perhaps a
>>>>             method to
>>>>             collate results from separate build farms. I'm sure a common
>>>>             set formats
>>>>             for presentation could be agreed upon. Knowing that a change
>>>>             in, say,
>>>>             x86, breaks arm, aarch64, ppc64, s390x would be useful for
>>>>             everyone.
>>>>
>>>>             Best regards,
>>>>                  Stuart
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             On 15/01/17 13:07, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>                 The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for
>>>>                 some of the
>>>>                 more common platforms.  This will be for R&D and
>>>>                 academic research
>>>>                 purposes only.
>>>>
>>>>                 If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would
>>>>                 like to help
>>>>                 then please let me know!
>>>>
>>>>                 Cheers,
>>>>                 Martijn
>>>>
>>>>                 On 13 January 2017 at 20:50, dalibor topic
>>>>                 <[hidden email]
>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>>>                 <mailto:[hidden email]
>>>>                 <mailto:[hidden email]>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                       On 12.01.2017 20:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                           Oracle runs tests on many platforms; why does
>>>>                 this report only
>>>>                           include
>>>>                           one platform?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                       It would be rather nice to see more people run the
>>>>                 OpenJDK jtreg
>>>>                       tests on their own OpenJDK builds on platforms of
>>>>                 their choice and
>>>>                       post the results regularly.
>>>>
>>>>                       The great thing about these tests is that it
>>>>                 doesn't have to be
>>>>                       someone at Oracle doing all the running and all
>>>>                 the posting.
>>>>
>>>>                       cheers,
>>>>                       dalibor topic
>>>>                       --
>>>>                       <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal
>>>>                 Product Manager
>>>>                       Phone: +494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214>
>>>>                 <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:+494089091214
>>>>                 <tel:%2B494089091214>
>>>>                       <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: +491737185961
>>>>                 <tel:%2B491737185961> <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>>>                       <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>>>                 <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>>>>
>>>>                       ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 |
>>>>                 22761 Hamburg
>>>>
>>>>                       ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>>>                       Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>>>>                       Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA
>>>> 95603
>>>>
>>>>                       Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>>>>                       Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht,
>>>> Niederlande
>>>>                       Handelsregister der Handelskammer
>>>>                 Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>>>>                       Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan
>>>>                 Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>>>
>>>>                       <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>>>                 <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>
>>>>                       <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>>>>                 <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>>> Oracle is committed
>>>>                 to developing
>>>>                       practices and products that help protect the
>>>>                 environment
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
>>> Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
>>> <tel:+491737185961>
>>>
>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>>>
>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>>>
>>> Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
>>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>>
>>> <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
>>> practices and products that help protect the environment
>>
>>
12