See CR for details. In brief, fixed the `inspect` command to remove duplicate output:
hsdb> inspect 0x00000007fef00770 instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ 0x00000007fef00770 @ 0x00000007fef00770 (size = 160) in: Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream @ 0x0000000082005b08 Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream @ 0x0000000082005b08 out: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x0000000082007b60 Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x0000000082007b60 err: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x000000008200e0c8 Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x000000008200e0c8 It should be: hsdb> inspect 0x00000007fef00770 instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ 0x00000007fef00770 (size = 160) in: Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream @ 0x0000000082005b08 out: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x0000000082007b60 err: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x000000008200e0c8 ------------- Commit messages: - Fixed some comments. - Fixed some comments. - Fixed inspect command so it doesn't duplicate some output Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2582/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=2582&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8261269 Stats: 116 lines in 2 files changed: 90 ins; 22 del; 4 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2582.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2582/head:pull/2582 PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2582 |
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 07:28:45 GMT, Chris Plummer <[hidden email]> wrote:
> See CR for details. In brief, fixed the `inspect` command to remove duplicate output: > > hsdb> inspect 0x00000007fef00770 > instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ 0x00000007fef00770 @ 0x00000007fef00770 (size = 160) > in: Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream @ 0x0000000082005b08 Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream @ 0x0000000082005b08 > out: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x0000000082007b60 Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x0000000082007b60 > err: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x000000008200e0c8 Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x000000008200e0c8 > It should be: > > hsdb> inspect 0x00000007fef00770 > instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ 0x00000007fef00770 (size = 160) > in: Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream @ 0x0000000082005b08 > out: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x0000000082007b60 > err: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x000000008200e0c8 It looks good to me. One side comment about the test. It is not easy to read the code with the same pattern (e.g. "Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream") repeated several times. I understand, you prefer to make it more explicit but it'd be more readable if a predefined pattern is used like below: String pattern = "Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream"; + expStrMap.put(cmd, List.of("instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ " + examineResult, + "in: " + pattern + @")); . . . + unexpStrMap.put(cmd, List.of( + "instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ " + examineResult + " @ " + examineResult, + "in: " + pattern + " .* " + pattern)); Just an opinion with no pressure. It is up to you. Thanks, Serguei ------------- Marked as reviewed by sspitsyn (Reviewer). PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2582 |
In reply to this post by Chris Plummer-2
> See CR for details. In brief, fixed the `inspect` command to remove duplicate output:
> > hsdb> inspect 0x00000007fef00770 > instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ 0x00000007fef00770 @ 0x00000007fef00770 (size = 160) > in: Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream @ 0x0000000082005b08 Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream @ 0x0000000082005b08 > out: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x0000000082007b60 Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x0000000082007b60 > err: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x000000008200e0c8 Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x000000008200e0c8 > It should be: > > hsdb> inspect 0x00000007fef00770 > instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ 0x00000007fef00770 (size = 160) > in: Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream @ 0x0000000082005b08 > out: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x0000000082007b60 > err: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x000000008200e0c8 Chris Plummer has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Put replicated strings into a local variable. ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2582/files - new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2582/files/d5a300c3..1304bd78 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=2582&range=01 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=2582&range=00-01 Stats: 8 lines in 1 file changed: 2 ins; 0 del; 6 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2582.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2582/head:pull/2582 PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2582 |
In reply to this post by Serguei Spitsyn-2
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 23:30:04 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Chris Plummer has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: >> >> Put replicated strings into a local variable. > > It looks good to me. > One side comment about the test. It is not easy to read the code with the same pattern (e.g. "Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream") repeated several times. I understand, you prefer to make it more explicit but it'd be more readable if a predefined pattern is used like below: > String pattern = "Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream"; > + expStrMap.put(cmd, List.of("instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ " + examineResult, > + "in: " + pattern + @")); > . . . > + unexpStrMap.put(cmd, List.of( > + "instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ " + examineResult + " @ " + examineResult, > + "in: " + pattern + " .* " + pattern)); > > Just an opinion with no pressure. It is up to you. > > Thanks, > Serguei Good idea. I've added the pattern strings. Thanks! ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2582 |
In reply to this post by Chris Plummer-2
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:43:01 GMT, Chris Plummer <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> See CR for details. In brief, fixed the `inspect` command to remove duplicate output: >> >> hsdb> inspect 0x00000007fef00770 >> instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ 0x00000007fef00770 @ 0x00000007fef00770 (size = 160) >> in: Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream @ 0x0000000082005b08 Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream @ 0x0000000082005b08 >> out: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x0000000082007b60 Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x0000000082007b60 >> err: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x000000008200e0c8 Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x000000008200e0c8 >> It should be: >> >> hsdb> inspect 0x00000007fef00770 >> instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ 0x00000007fef00770 (size = 160) >> in: Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream @ 0x0000000082005b08 >> out: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x0000000082007b60 >> err: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x000000008200e0c8 > > Chris Plummer has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: > > Put replicated strings into a local variable. Marked as reviewed by kevinw (Committer). ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2582 |
In reply to this post by Chris Plummer-2
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:43:04 GMT, Chris Plummer <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> It looks good to me. >> One side comment about the test. It is not easy to read the code with the same pattern (e.g. "Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream") repeated several times. I understand, you prefer to make it more explicit but it'd be more readable if a predefined pattern is used like below: >> String pattern = "Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream"; >> + expStrMap.put(cmd, List.of("instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ " + examineResult, >> + "in: " + pattern + @")); >> . . . >> + unexpStrMap.put(cmd, List.of( >> + "instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ " + examineResult + " @ " + examineResult, >> + "in: " + pattern + " .* " + pattern)); >> >> Just an opinion with no pressure. It is up to you. >> >> Thanks, >> Serguei > > Good idea. I've added the pattern strings. Thanks! That's great, much more readable output! Looks good. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2582 |
In reply to this post by Kevin Walls-2
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 12:05:20 GMT, Kevin Walls <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Chris Plummer has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: >> >> Put replicated strings into a local variable. > > Marked as reviewed by kevinw (Committer). Thanks Serguei and Kevin! ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2582 |
In reply to this post by Chris Plummer-2
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 07:28:45 GMT, Chris Plummer <[hidden email]> wrote:
> See CR for details. In brief, fixed the `inspect` command to remove duplicate output: > > hsdb> inspect 0x00000007fef00770 > instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ 0x00000007fef00770 @ 0x00000007fef00770 (size = 160) > in: Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream @ 0x0000000082005b08 Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream @ 0x0000000082005b08 > out: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x0000000082007b60 Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x0000000082007b60 > err: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x000000008200e0c8 Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x000000008200e0c8 > It should be: > > hsdb> inspect 0x00000007fef00770 > instance of Oop for java/lang/Class @ 0x00000007fef00770 (size = 160) > in: Oop for java/io/BufferedInputStream @ 0x0000000082005b08 > out: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x0000000082007b60 > err: Oop for java/io/PrintStream @ 0x000000008200e0c8 This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: aea474c4 Author: Chris Plummer <[hidden email]> URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/aea474c4 Stats: 117 lines in 2 files changed: 92 ins; 22 del; 3 mod 8261269: When using clhsdb to "inspect" a java object, clhsdb prints "Oop for..." twice Reviewed-by: sspitsyn, kevinw ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2582 |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |