RFR JDK-8184120 : javax.transaction.xa.Xid constants reference obsolete method names

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

RFR JDK-8184120 : javax.transaction.xa.Xid constants reference obsolete method names

Lance Andersen
Hi all

The following change was addressed in the JTA 1.0.1B  update but looks like the field descriptions  were missed when the method names changed.

The CSR for this change has also been approved.


—————————
 hg diff
diff -r 74988518da9a src/java.sql/share/classes/javax/transaction/xa/Xid.java
--- a/src/java.sql/share/classes/javax/transaction/xa/Xid.java Tue Aug 01 15:59:07 2017 -0700
+++ b/src/java.sql/share/classes/javax/transaction/xa/Xid.java Fri Aug 04 14:01:14 2017 -0400
@@ -38,12 +38,12 @@
 public interface Xid {
 
     /**
-     * Maximum number of bytes returned by getGtrid.
+     * Maximum number of bytes returned by {@link #getGlobalTransactionId }.
      */
     final static int MAXGTRIDSIZE = 64;
 
     /**
-     * Maximum number of bytes returned by getBqual.
+     * Maximum number of bytes returned by {@link #getBranchQualifier }.
      */
     final static int MAXBQUALSIZE = 64;
————————————

Best
Lance

 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: RFR JDK-8184120 : javax.transaction.xa.Xid constants reference obsolete method names

Paul Sandoz

> On 11 Aug 2017, at 11:30, Lance Andersen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> The following change was addressed in the JTA 1.0.1B  update but looks like the field descriptions  were missed when the method names changed.
>
> The CSR for this change has also been approved.
>

+1

Paul.
Loading...